Write My Liberty BUSI 570 Assignments

Threads for the four forums fall in the odd weeks; each runs about 400 words, cites three scholarly sources plus the text, and earns up to 75 points. Replies to two classmates, due the following weeks, are 200 words each with two scholarly sources, worth 60 points.

Week five's case study is eight to ten APA pages, written as if it were a new Hess and Cameron chapter: one organization, one biblical value it has shown, and five or more references beyond the textbooks and Scripture. It is worth 200 points.

Week seven's group presentation pairs a four-to-five-page paper, which folds every member's value into one organization's credo, with a narrated deck of ten or more slides. It is worth 160 points.

The ethics journal answers the questions accompanying each week's Rae and Wong readings on the provided template, in the first person, with no additional research or APA required. It is submitted in week eight and worth 100 points.

The checklist accounts for the remaining 10 points.

There are no exams. The first week runs Monday to Friday, later weeks Saturday to Friday, and the journal is collected in week eight.

A graduate business program assessment in week three carries no points but is required.

Rae and Wong readings accompany every week, and the journal questions follow them.

Forum threads use Hess and Cameron's argument that organizations can lead with values and still perform well, supported by research on positive organizational scholarship.

Threads on dilemmas apply two of Rae and Wong's frameworks, such as consequences and principles, and show where a biblical worldview resolves the tension.

The case study follows the pattern of Hess and Cameron's chapters, profiling an organization and the value it practices, with documented evidence and the value's scriptural grounding.

Your group part merges the members' values into one credo, showing how they fit, support each other and become daily practice.

Journal entries examine, honestly, how the reading tests your own choices at work.

The final forum discusses how leaders keep values alive through growth and leadership transitions.

Forum 1 typically asks whether ethics and performance conflict, and the thread answers with Hess and Cameron's evidence that values-led firms often outperform.

Forum 2 compares the chapter's organization with research on ethical culture and draws one lesson a leader could apply.

Forum 3 often poses a dilemma, so the thread works through consequences and principles before showing where Scripture settles the question.

The case study pairs a biblically grounded virtue with a company whose recorded decisions display it.

Its sources include business press accounts of the company's decisions, business ethics research on the virtue and the company's own reports, so the evidence does not rest on self-description.

The group's narration script is written for speaking, one point per slide.

Forum 4 asks how leaders sustain ethical cultures, and the thread names practices, such as hiring for character and telling the company's story, that keep values alive.

Each journal answer names a specific situation from your own work, so the reflection is concrete.

Replies engage a classmate's argument with a new source or a counterexample, and stay within about 200 words.

The credo paper explains how the members' virtues fit together and what practices would make each one real in daily work.

Forum replies add a scholarly source and a point the classmate did not make.

Journal entries use real situations.

Slides carry one point each.

Writers here hold graduate training in business ethics or leadership, and many have helped organizations put their values into practice.

They know positive organizational scholarship and the business ethics journals, which covers the forums' source requirements.

They use Rae and Wong's frameworks to work through dilemmas and bring in Scripture where it actually decides the question.

Several have drafted corporate credos, which helps with the group paper.

Each profile, thread and journal entry gets a second reader, and the writer works without your name.

Many have taught business ethics, so they know what instructors expect from a dilemma analysis.

They have read widely in positive organizational scholarship, including Cameron's research on virtuousness and performance.

They write warmly and plainly about character, which suits the journal and the forums.

Threads lose points with fewer than three scholarly sources beyond the text, and replies with fewer than two.

The case study loses points under eight pages, with fewer than five references, or when the organization's value is asserted rather than shown through decisions.

It also loses points when the value's scriptural grounding is thin or missing.

Group papers lose points when the members' values are simply listed instead of integrated into one organization's focus.

A journal that restates the reading, instead of examining your own choices, scores poorly.

Narrated slides lose points when the narration only reads the text on each slide.

Replies lose points under 200 words or when they agree without adding a source or a counterpoint.

Case studies also lose points when they choose a value with only a loose connection to Scripture.

Threads also lose points when they treat Scripture as decoration rather than as part of the reasoning.

Narration scripts also lose points when they run far past or short of the time the slides need.

A thread takes about two days, most of it finding scholarly sources, and the replies a day once classmates post.

The case study takes six to eight days, including the search for documented evidence.

Your group share takes two to three days once the members' papers are in.

Journal entries take under a day each when your notes are ready.

The case study is the largest line, and ordering it with your group share lowers both. Urgent work costs more.

Ordering by week three gives the case study time for research before its week-five deadline.

Forum lines cover the thread and both replies, and journal entries are priced per week.

Sending your company and value choices early lets research start before week three.