Take My Liberty PhD in Nursing Education Classes

NURS 764 Learning Theories and Teaching Methods for Nurse Educators is a single teaching project in six parts, from objectives through classroom, clinical and online teaching to a final integrated submission, with two forums.

NURS 765 Curriculum Development and Program Evaluation for Nurse Educators asks for three forums, a curriculum development workshop assignment, a frame factor assessment and a three-part group project on curriculum and its evaluation.

NURS 766 Advanced Evaluation Strategies for Nurse Educators asks for five written assignments on blueprints, item writing and analysis, a test administration paper, a grading philosophy paper, three forums and a clinical evaluation tool, with two quizzes.

NURS 767 Transition to the Nurse Educator Role asks for five written assignments, six forums and a clinical faculty role development paper beside a teaching practicum with a preceptor.

The program's research methods, statistics and dissertation courses fall outside these pages. Each of the four educator courses has its own page with its graded items by Module/Week.

Students sometimes ask why the sequence matters. Each course prepares a faculty skill that hiring committees and deans look for: designing a lesson that works, building a curriculum that meets accreditation standards, writing a fair exam and stepping into the faculty role with a mentor's support.

PhD students in nursing education usually teach while they study, so each course is planned around the academic calendar they are already living. When a course opens, the coordinator dates every written item ahead of its deadline and marks quiz weeks, group deadlines and practicum weeks.

The four courses build on each other, and the plan uses that. A topic and objectives from the NURS 764 teaching project can inform the program outcomes discussed in NURS 765, the blueprint and items written in NURS 766 and the teaching you reflect on in NURS 767.

Where a course includes group work, as NURS 765 does, only your assigned sections are prepared, in your group's template.

Where a course includes quizzes or a practicum, as NURS 766 and NURS 767 do, those stay with you, and the writing is scheduled so it never collides with them.

You submit everything yourself, and nothing is posted to a forum on your behalf.

Coursework in the educator sequence is written by nurse educators with a PhD or EdD who have taught in classroom, laboratory, clinical and online settings, served on curriculum and testing committees and mentored new faculty.

Each course goes to the writer best suited to it: an instructional designer for the teaching project in NURS 764, a curriculum committee chair for NURS 765, a testing committee member for NURS 766 and a faculty mentor for NURS 767.

Each writer knows the text behind their course and the competencies academic nursing measures itself against.

A second doctorally prepared nurse educator reviews the larger items in every course before delivery.

Your institution, learners and colleagues are never named, and test items are always written fresh rather than drawn from published test banks.

Writers are also matched by setting where they can be: an associate degree faculty member for students who teach in ADN programs, a university professor for those in BSN or graduate programs, and a clinical education specialist for hospital educators.

The first sticking point is alignment. The educator sequence rewards work in which objectives, strategies and evaluation fit together, and that thread is easy to lose across six project parts in NURS 764 or three group parts in NURS 765.

The second is technical skill. Writing sound test items, building a blueprint and interpreting item statistics in NURS 766 are skills many experienced educators have never been formally taught.

The third is group work. NURS 765's group project carries half of that course's points and depends on classmates in other schools and time zones.

The fourth is the practicum in NURS 767, which adds teaching hours, logs and a preceptor evaluation to a full writing load.

The last is time. Students who teach full loads meet their own course deadlines in the same weeks they write exams and grade papers for their students.

A further difficulty is translation. Many students are excellent bedside teachers but have never had to justify their methods in writing, and the courses ask them to name the theory, the evidence and the standard behind each decision.

Each educator course is quoted on its own, from its guide and your section's prompts. NURS 764 is graded almost entirely on writing; NURS 765's figure depends on your group share; NURS 766 excludes its two quizzes; and NURS 767 excludes its practicum items.

The ideal start is just before a course opens, so topics, content areas and practicum details can be settled before the first deadline. Mid-course starts are quoted on what is left.

Many students hand over NURS 764 and NURS 766, the two courses with the most written items; others hand over NURS 765 and NURS 767 because group and practicum demands leave them least time.

Every course comes with a dated plan and its own figure, agreed one course at a time.

The doctorate's research courses and dissertation are not part of any plan here.

Students who teach in fall and spring terms often time the heaviest courses for summer sub-terms, and the coordinator can plan around that.