Take My Liberty NURS 765 Class

Liberty's catalog says NURS 765 prepares students to design, implement and evaluate curriculum, applying research and evidence-based theories to curriculum development and program evaluation and exploring the faculty member's role in both.

In the published guide, Module/Week 1 reads Keating's opening chapters on the history and concepts of curriculum, with the checklist, introductions and Discussion Board Forum 1, worth 100 points. Module/Week 2 reads the chapters on the curriculum development process and the faculty role, and asks for a Curriculum Development Workshop assignment, worth 100.

Module/Week 3 reads the chapters on frame factors and asks for an Internal or External Frame Factor Assessment, worth 100. Module/Week 4 reads the chapters on philosophy, mission and organizing frameworks and asks for Forum 2.

Modules/Weeks 5, 6 and 7 read Keating on curriculum designs, outcomes, course development and program evaluation while groups build a project in three parts, worth 150, 150 and 200.

Module/Week 8 reads the closing chapters on accreditation and research in nursing education and asks for Forum 3.

The class starts with your setting. The coordinator asks what kind of program you teach in or would like to teach in, whether an ADN, BSN, RN to BSN, MSN or a hospital residency, because Keating's process applies differently to each.

The forums are drafted from Keating's chapters and your committee or teaching experience, with replies after classmates post.

The workshop assignment follows your section's prompt. Where it asks for a written product, such as a plan for a faculty workshop on curriculum or a reflection on workshop content, the writer drafts it; where it is an activity you attend or complete online, you do it and the writer can help with any written follow-up.

The frame factor assessment examines the internal factors, such as mission, resources, faculty and students, or the external factors, such as community, health care trends, regulation and accreditation, that shape a program you know.

For the group project, the writer drafts your assigned sections of each part once the group has divided the work, in the group's format, so your sections fit theirs. You submit everything yourself.

NURS 765 is placed with a nurse educator who holds a PhD or EdD and has served on or chaired curriculum committees, written program outcomes and prepared accreditation self-studies. Curriculum mapping and systematic evaluation plans are familiar territory for that person.

The writer follows Keating's model of curriculum development and evaluation, and draws on the AACN Essentials, NLN competencies, state board rules and the standards of accrediting bodies such as ACEN and CCNE where they apply.

A second nurse educator with a doctorate reviews the frame factor assessment and your group sections before you receive them, checking accuracy and alignment with the course's framework.

Your school or employer is described only by type and size, never by name, even when the assessment is based on a real program.

The same writer prepares every item, so the language and framework you use stay consistent across forums, assessment and group work.

Students get stuck first on the frame factor assessment. It asks for analysis, not description: how each factor helps or constrains the curriculum and what that means for design decisions. Lists of factors without analysis lose points.

They get stuck on terminology. Philosophy, mission, organizing framework, program outcomes, level outcomes and course outcomes are distinct ideas in Keating's model, and blurring them weakens forums and group sections alike.

They get stuck on the group project, worth half the grade. Groups must agree on a program and approach quickly, divide sections and keep a consistent voice across three submissions in three weeks.

They get stuck on program evaluation, which many students have never written. A systematic evaluation plan needs criteria, data sources, responsible parties, timelines and thresholds, aligned with accreditation standards.

The last is pace: the group project begins in Module/Week 5 and does not let up until Module/Week 7.

Hand over NURS 765 before it opens and Forum 1 is ready for Module/Week 1. The workshop assignment, where written, arrives before Module/Week 2, and the frame factor assessment before Module/Week 3.

Forum 2 arrives before Module/Week 4. Your group sections arrive a few days after your group assigns them in each of Modules/Weeks 5, 6 and 7, early enough for the group to combine and review them. Forum 3 arrives before Module/Week 8.

The quote lists the forums, the workshop assignment where written, the frame factor assessment and your share of each group part. The group's joint decisions and any live workshop activity never appear on it.

Group sections are priced once your group has divided the work, so the figure reflects your real share.

If you join partway through, the price covers what remains, and your sections are written to fit what your group has already submitted.