Do My Liberty BUSI 570 Course for Me

Week one, Monday to Friday, reads Hess and Cameron's first chapter and the Rae and Wong selections, with the checklist, introductions, the Forum 1 thread and the first journal entry.

Week two continues Rae and Wong, with the Forum 1 replies and a journal entry.

Week three reads Hess and Cameron's second chapter, with the program assessment, the Forum 2 thread and a journal entry.

Week four continues Rae and Wong, with the Forum 2 replies and a journal entry.

Week five reads chapter six, with the Forum 3 thread, the case study paper and a journal entry.

Week six continues Rae and Wong, with the Forum 3 replies and a journal entry.

Week seven reads chapter nine, with the Forum 4 thread, the group presentation and a journal entry.

Week eight brings the Forum 4 replies and the full ethics journal, due on the last Friday. Every week after the first runs Saturday to Friday.

Rae and Wong's readings are spread across all eight weeks, while Hess and Cameron's chapters fall in the odd weeks.

A graduate program assessment in week three carries no points but appears on the schedule.

Forum threads are written early in their weeks, with three scholarly sources and the text. Each sets the chapter's company against the research and ends with something a leader could do on Monday.

Where a prompt poses a dilemma, the thread works through it with two of Rae and Wong's frameworks and shows where a biblical worldview resolves the tension.

Replies are drafted once classmates post, each with two scholarly sources and a point the classmate had not made.

The case study's organization and value are agreed with you in week three. Research runs through week four, and the paper is delivered early in week five.

Your group share is drafted in week six from the members' papers and delivered before the group's internal date in week seven, with slide notes ready for narration.

Journal entries are drafted weekly from the notes you send, in your voice, and assembled for week eight.

For the profile, sources include business press accounts of specific decisions, scholarly work on the virtue, and the company's own reports, so the evidence is independent.

Group slides carry short phrases and one image or example each, with the explanation saved for the narration script you record.

Journal entries are honest rather than polished: they name a real pressure you face and how the week's reading changes your view of it.

The case study sets the company's decisions beside the virtue's meaning in Scripture, then notes where the company has fallen short, which strengthens the argument.

Forum 4's thread looks at how values survive growth and leadership change, using examples of companies that kept or lost their character after a founder left.

Sources for each thread come from business ethics journals and organizational research, so they meet the scholarly requirement.

Someone trained in business ethics, often with culture-change work behind them, writes your pieces.

They know the research Hess and Cameron draw on and the frameworks in Rae and Wong.

They write about Scripture and business carefully.

A second reviewer reads each item before delivery.

The same writer handles the whole course, and your identity stays with the coordinator.

Several have helped companies write or revise their values statements, which shapes the group credo.

They know Rae and Wong's treatment of the major ethical theories and when each helps in a real decision.

Many have taught business ethics, so the forums read like the work of someone who has graded them.

They write plainly and warmly, which suits reflection on character and leadership.

Several have consulted on company culture, which helps when a prompt asks how a leader shapes values.

The case study is hard because it needs documented evidence, not an organization's own claims.

Every forum needs scholarly sources, and the replies need their own.

Week five pairs the case study with a forum thread, and week seven pairs the group presentation with another.

A journal left to the last week loses the honesty it is graded on.

Group timing depends on every member's case study arriving by week five.

Choosing a well-known company can backfire if its record includes public scandals that cut against the virtue.

Five scholarly sources beyond the books are required for the profile, and business ethics journals are the best place to find them.

Dilemma prompts need two frameworks weighed fairly before a biblical answer is given, which takes careful drafting.

The group presentation's narration must sound natural, which means the script has to be written for speaking.

The case study's five scholarly references must come from beyond the two course books and the Bible.

Forum replies need two scholarly sources each, which is easy to forget when they feel like short comments.

Threads come at the start of the odd weeks; replies follow in the even ones.

The case study arrives early in week five.

Your group share arrives before your group's deadline in week seven.

Journal entries arrive each week, ready for week eight.

The case study is the largest cost, the group share and forums next, the journal smaller.

Each forum is one line on the quote, replies included, and booking every piece at the start lowers each line.

If you join after week three, the plan starts with the next piece due, and the case study can still be finished by week five.

Each delivery comes with a one-line note on what it argues, so you can speak to it in class.

Journal weeks you have written yourself are simply left out of the plan.

Every piece is an editable file.