Write My Liberty ACCT 370 Assignments

The week-one spreadsheet introduces the company and rivals and sets out three years of their financial statements. It must be listed on a major exchange and approved by email.

Week three's part computes ratios for all of them.

Part 3, in week five, is horizontal and vertical analysis of the statements.

Part 4, in week seven, is a set of projected financial statements for the company.

The forum takes a 750-word thread in week two and two 350-word replies in week three, each with two refereed sources beyond the texts.

Week eight's report sets out your research and numbers in 2,000 or more words with eight reputable outside sources.

Your instructor's prompt for the forum may differ from the guide's example, and the thread is written to the version your section posts.

The report is written the way an analyst's note is. Its first paragraph states the conclusion, for example that the company is financially stable but losing ground on margins to its main rival, and the rest of the report proves it.

The body moves through the evidence in order of importance rather than in the order of the workbook: the two or three trends that matter most, the ratios that confirm them, the cash flow picture and what the projections suggest for the next two years.

Market research from reputable sources, industry reports, company presentations and financial press, sets the numbers in context, and the textbook supplies the analytical frame, such as its treatment of earnings quality.

Each workbook part is labeled and commented: ratio groups carry a note on which company leads and why, and the projections tab lists its assumptions in plain words.

The thread uses a live example, perhaps rising profit with falling operating cash, and the replies build on classmates' cases with research.

A typical report runs in four movements: the verdict, the evidence from the ratios and trends, the cash flow and projection picture, and the risks that could change the verdict.

The ratio analysis in Part 2 groups ratios by liquidity, solvency, profitability and efficiency, and compares each with the competitors' figures.

The report closes with a recommendation, such as whether the company's position is improving or weakening, supported by the ratios and the research.

The report's conclusion states whether the company is stronger or weaker than its rivals, and why.

Forum replies test a classmate's example against the company's cash flow statement, asking whether earnings quality holds up.

The writers are financial analysts, equity and credit researchers, FP&A analysts and CPAs who review statements, many with CFA study behind them.

They build comparison models and write analysis notes in their jobs, so the workbook reads like a professional model and the report like a professional note.

A colleague rechecks every tab and the report, and only the coordinator knows whose project it is.

Comments on each part are carried into the next and into the report. Where a prompt asks for a biblical perspective, such as truthful reporting, it is answered with care and tied to the analysis.

Several have written company reports for clients, which is close to what the final report asks you to produce.

Many have presented company analyses to managers who wanted the answer first, which is why the report opens with its verdict.

Their workbooks follow the conventions analysts use, with inputs, calculations and outputs kept on separate tabs.

Workbook parts lose marks when values are typed rather than calculated, when competitors' line items are not standardized, or when ratios appear without a comment explaining what they show.

Horizontal and vertical analysis loses marks when it lists every percentage without flagging the few trends that matter.

Projections lose marks when assumptions are missing or disconnected from the company's history and guidance.

The report loses marks when it walks through every ratio before reaching a view, when it uses fewer than eight reputable sources, or when its numbers disagree with the workbook.

Forum replies lose marks when they fall short of 350 words or omit the peer-reviewed sources the course requires.

The report also loses marks when its market research comes from unreliable sites rather than filings, industry reports and established financial press.

Part 1 loses marks when it mixes fiscal years across companies, so each company's statements are aligned to comparable year ends before anything else.

Workbooks also slip when tabs are unlabeled or units are mixed, such as thousands on one tab and millions on another.

Excel parts also lose points when the competitor data cover different years from the company's.

Part 1 takes two to three days once the company is approved, since three years of statements for several companies must be gathered and standardized.

Parts 2 and 3 take about two days each, and Part 4 about three, because the assumptions need care.

The report takes about five days and is best ordered by week six, and the forum thread and replies take about two days and one day.

Each item is priced by its size; the report is the largest line. A week-one order for the whole project is the lowest total, and finishing your own workbook costs less than a fresh build.

The forum can be ordered alone if you want help with that one exchange.

Excel parts come early enough to check the numbers yourself.