Write My Liberty ACCT 340 Assignments

The reflection paper, in week two, is a three-page paper in current APA on the major ethics systems. Three outside references are required, and since it is a reflection, it describes the systems briefly and then states your own position.

Week four's paper spends five to seven pages on duty-based and consequence-based ethics, citing five refereed sources besides the AICPA Code and Scripture. Its 200 points tie it for the heaviest item.

The week-eight group paper, 12 to 15 pages on the course's decision model with nine refereed sources, is built in the group wiki and paired with slides.

Five forums, in weeks one, three, five, six and seven, each pair a 750-word thread with a 250-word reply to a groupmate, 100 points apiece.

The individual paper is built around one dilemma, described in a paragraph: a staff accountant notices that a manager has charged personal meals to a client project, small amounts, repeatedly. The paper then asks what a deontologist would require, duties that hold regardless of consequences, and what a utilitarian would weigh, the harms and benefits to everyone affected.

With both answers on the table, it turns to the AICPA Code and argues which theory its principles, integrity, objectivity, independence and due care, most resemble, noting where the Code also attends to the public interest. A short section relates the analysis to scripture, and the conclusion states what the accountant should do.

The reflection paper is shorter and more personal. It describes the major systems in a paragraph each, compares them with a Christian worldview and then answers honestly which reasoning you fall back on when a decision is hard, using a few notes you send.

Your share of the group paper applies the decision-making model step by step to the group's dilemma, so the model produces a decision rather than being described, and the PowerPoint slides follow that case.

Forum threads take a real case for each chapter, a scandal, a fraud or an earnings management dispute, and analyze it with the chapter's ideas.

Every discussion thread ends with a short question to the group, which invites replies and shows engagement with the chapter.

The group paper applies the course's decision model step by step to a case, naming the facts, the stakeholders, the ethical issues, the alternatives and the choice.

Forum threads use Mintz and Morris's cases and tie each to the AICPA Code's principles of integrity, objectivity and independence.

The reflection states plainly which reasoning you trust.

Forum threads take a real accounting scandal from the chapter and ask which principle of the AICPA Code the people involved set aside, and why.

The writers are CPAs and accounting professionals with formal ethics training, often from audit, internal audit or compliance, and several have taught professional ethics or studied theology.

That mix is what lets one paper apply the AICPA Code precisely, treat deontology and utilitarianism fairly and bring in scripture in a way that is specific rather than decorative.

Another ethics-trained reader checks every paper and thread, and only the coordinator knows whose they are.

Notes on your reflection carry into the theory paper, and notes on early threads into later ones. For the group paper, only your assigned section is written, in the group's format.

A few have drafted firm ethics policies, close to what the team paper requires.

The reflection paper loses marks when it stays neutral, describing the systems without ever saying where the writer stands.

The individual paper loses marks when the two theories are applied to different examples, which hides how they differ, or when the AICPA Code is missing from the sources.

It also loses marks when scripture is quoted without being tied to the dilemma, or when fewer than five peer-reviewed sources are used.

Forum threads lose marks under 750 words or when they retell a scandal without analyzing the choices people made, and replies lose marks under 250 words.

The group paper loses marks when its sections disagree about the dilemma or describe the model in the abstract instead of applying it.

Theory papers also slip when they treat the AICPA Code as purely rule-based, ignoring its attention to the public interest.

Discussion replies also slip when they restate the groupmate's case instead of testing it with a different theory.

Group papers also lose points when the PowerPoint does not match the paper's argument.

Discussion threads take two days and replies one.

The reflection paper takes two to three days, since it depends on your notes about your own views.

The individual paper takes about five days, so ordering it in week two is the safe choice, and your share of the group paper takes three to five days depending on its size, with the slides a day more.

Each item is priced by its length and research, with the individual paper and the group share as the largest lines. One order for the course is cheapest, and finishing your own draft costs less than a new one.

The reflection can be ordered last, after you have seen the theory paper, if you want time to think about your own view first.