Do My Liberty BUSI 472 Course for Me

The forums run on a two-week cycle, threads at 60 points in weeks one, three, five and seven and replies at 30 in the even weeks, each following that fortnight's Hosmer chapter.

Week two gathers four smaller items: the Business Etiquette PowerPoint at 40, the group case outline at 30, the ungraded research topic and the first replies.

Week three adds the 30-point annotated bibliography, and weeks four and five carry Case Assignments 1 and 2 at 100 each, built on Ferrell's first and ninth cases.

Week six brings the 100-point group case final, and week seven the 20-point Personal Code of Ethics beside the last thread.

Week eight closes with the last replies and the 200-point research paper.

Seen as a list, the course is front-loaded with small items and back-loaded with large ones.

In practice, the first fortnight sets up three later pieces at once, the paper, the team project and the forum cycle, which is why it is the most common point to hand the course over.

The two video cases add context rather than writing: the money-laundering case sits beside the bibliography in week three and the Enron case beside Case Assignment 2 in week five, and both are quizzed rather than written.

A Hosmer thread brings the chapter to bear on a real decision and sets a secular reading beside a Judeo-Christian one before concluding.

Replies test a classmate's conclusion with a framework they did not use, which earns more than agreement.

Case assignments set out the facts and stakeholders, apply the decision-making framework from Ferrell, compare the ethical views and recommend what management should have done, with the business consequences.

The etiquette PowerPoint is built as a short, clear presentation on professional conduct, with speaker notes where your prompt asks for them.

Your group shares follow the group's outline, and the research paper moves from topic to annotated sources to a 200-point argument.

Your personal code comes from your own notes and convictions.

Everything is cited in APA 7 and delivered early.

A thread on Hosmer's chapter about economic analysis, for example, might take a retailer's decision to cut staff hours before the holidays and ask whether market efficiency alone can justify it, then show what a stewardship view would add.

Your share of the team case final is matched to the team's headings and voice, so the merged document reads as one analysis rather than four.

Annotated sources for the paper are chosen for the topic approved in week two, mixing a scholarly article or two with an official report and, where relevant, a case from Ferrell.

The code of ethics, drafted from your notes, names a handful of specific commitments, such as how you would respond to pressure to misstate results, and the scripture or principle behind each.

An ethics professional does the coursework, usually someone from compliance, ethics consulting or HR investigations, with graduate study in ethics or business.

They write ethics analyses and policy recommendations at work, which suits the cases and the paper.

A second reviewer checks each case and paper stage before delivery.

One writer usually handles the whole course so the voice and the treatment of the paradigms stay consistent.

A short note on any framework is available before the video quizzes.

The code of ethics is written with care for your own convictions.

Many have led ethics training for staff, so they explain a framework the way a new manager can use it the next day.

They are comfortable discussing scripture and philosophy side by side without forcing one into the other's terms, which is the balance this course grades.

The number of deliverables is the real challenge; week two alone carries four of them, and missing one small item there often snowballs.

Threads and cases lose points when frameworks are named but never applied to the facts, and comparisons lose points when one paradigm is treated thinly.

Case assignments lose points without a recommendation management could act on, and the research paper loses points when its topic is too broad to argue in the space allowed.

The etiquette deck loses points when it reads as a list of rules without the reasons professionals follow them.

The team case adds coordination: four classmates must agree on a case reading before the outline in week two, which leaves little time if anyone is late.

Video cases on Enron and money laundering also reward close attention to detail, and students who skim them often miss quiz questions on specific decisions.

Hosmer threads are drafted before their odd weeks, and replies follow once classmates post.

The week-two items come early that week, and the annotated sources early in week three; Ferrell cases arrive early in weeks four and five, your team share before the group's date, and the code as week seven starts.

The 200-point paper arrives early in week eight, with time to read it.

The paper and the two Ferrell cases are the largest lines, and a mid-term order prices only what is still ahead.

The two Ferrell cases and the paper carry 400 points between them, and they are the items most students hand over first if they keep anything themselves.

Joining after week three is common; the plan then begins with Case Assignment 1 and the team final.