Write My Liberty BUSI 455 Assignments

The forum thread, in week one, applies Sande's opening chapters on peacemaking to a conflict the prompt sets or you choose.

The replies, in week two, engage classmates' threads, and the ExpertNegotiator analysis interprets the platform's assessment of your negotiating approach.

The Negotiation 1 planning document, in week three, prepares you for the first session.

The Negotiation 1 results, in week four, report and analyze what happened, written from your notes.

The Ethics Paper, in week five, argues a position on an ethics question in negotiation.

The Negotiation 2 planning document, in week six, prepares you for the second session, and the self-critique, in week eight, evaluates it.

The sessions in weeks four and seven, and the peer evaluations, are yours.

The analysis and the forum come before either negotiation, so they double as a chance to think about your own style before the first session.

Prompts change between sections, and the case packets for each negotiation come from your instructor, so the plans are written only once those packets are in hand.

A planning document opens with a one-paragraph summary of the situation and your goal, then works through Lewicki's planning steps with a table of issues, priorities, targets and resistance points.

It names your best alternative and estimates the other side's, then sets the strategy, the opening and the concessions you are prepared to make, in order.

The results write-up compares the agreement with your plan, explains why the outcome landed where it did and names one lesson for the next session.

The Ethics Paper states its position in the introduction, applies two or three ethical frameworks from Lewicki, brings in Sande's principles and answers the strongest objection.

The self-critique is honest and specific, tying each strength and weakness to a concept from the reading.

Forum posts and replies apply Sande and Lewicki to concrete conflicts.

Citations follow APA 7, and every document is proofread.

Where the case allows, the plan also anticipates the other side's opening and prepares a calm response, which keeps an early anchor from pulling the whole session toward their number.

The forum thread, by contrast, is reflective, applying Sande's early chapters to a conflict from work, church or family life and showing what a peacemaking response would look like there.

Writers for this course are professional negotiators and mediators, many with graduate study in conflict resolution or business, and some with training in Christian peacemaking.

They write negotiation briefs at work, which suits the plans.

Each plan and paper is checked by a second reviewer before delivery.

The coordinator relays files and keeps your identity private.

Comments on the first plan are applied to the second.

The Ethics Paper is written with care for both its secular and biblical sources.

Several have coached new buyers and sales staff before big negotiations, which is close to what the plans do for you.

They understand that a classroom negotiation is still a relationship, so the plans aim for agreements both students can accept, which is also what Sande's approach asks.

Many have also written post-negotiation reviews for their employers, the same habit the results write-up and the self-critique ask you to practice.

Planning documents lose marks when they set a target but no resistance point or best alternative, because then the plan cannot tell you when to walk away. They also lose marks when they ignore the other side's interests, which is where the textbook says the useful trades are found.

The results write-up loses marks when it narrates the session minute by minute without comparing the outcome with the plan or explaining why it landed where it did.

The Ethics Paper loses marks when it surveys views without taking a position, or when it uses Sande only as decoration instead of letting his principles do real work in the argument.

The self-critique loses marks when it is all praise, and forum posts lose marks when they summarize Sande's chapters without applying them to an actual conflict.

The ExpertNegotiator analysis loses marks when it repeats the platform's scores without saying what they mean for how you will negotiate.

A forum thread takes about two days, and the replies about a day once classmates have posted.

A planning document takes three to four days from the moment the case packet arrives, which is why sending it quickly matters; you need time to learn the plan before your session.

The Ethics Paper takes about four days, and the results write-up and the self-critique about two days each from your notes.

Each item is priced by its size. Pairing the two plans lowers both, and finishing a plan you started costs less than a fresh one.

Forum work and the analysis are quickest when booked together at the start of the course.