Write My Liberty ACCT 432 Assignments

Eight weekly projects treat chapter-end problems as short cases, scored 50, 75, 75, 100, 60, 80, 75 and 90, with problems that change with the chapter.

Forum 1, in week one, asks you to respond to a problem from an approved list on auditing and IT governance; Forum 2, in week two, on security; Forum 3, in week four, on transaction processing and the audit trail.

Each forum thread runs about 300 words with at least three scholarly citations, and you reply to two classmates in about 250 words each with at least one scholarly citation.

In week five the group writes one 1,000-word essay on Scripture and the course, posted to the group then the class, and every member is expected to contribute.

ACL Assignment 1, in week seven, and ACL Assignment 2, in week eight, use Audit Command Language on data your section provides, worth 80 and 125 points.

Each project's problems come from the chapter just read, so Project 2 might ask how to control access to a payroll database, and Project 7 how an auditor tests that sales are recorded in the right period.

The checklist, worth 10 points, is the only graded item that involves no writing.

Each project answer is built in four parts: the weakness the case reveals, the risk it creates for the organization's data or financial reporting, the control that would reduce that risk and the procedure an auditor would use to test it.

That structure suits every chapter. A sales cycle case links each risk to its assertion, such as existence or cutoff, and then to the matching test; cutoff appears often.

Data extraction answers describe their tests precisely enough that someone could run them: the fields compared, the condition that flags an exception and what an auditor would do with the flagged items.

Forum threads answer the chosen problem directly and support the answer with three scholarly sources, often COBIT, COSO or ISACA guidance alongside journal articles.

Your share of the faith essay connects a specific topic to a specific passage, such as faithful stewardship and access controls over entrusted assets, and explains the link in plain terms.

For the ERP project in week eight, the answer identifies which roles combine conflicting permissions, such as creating a vendor and approving its payment, and proposes a role design that separates them.

Fraud questions in the same week are answered with the fraud triangle, pressure, opportunity and rationalization, and the control that removes the opportunity.

ACL answers list the command used, the result and its meaning, so a reader can follow each test from start to finish.

ACL answers explain what each test result means for the audit.

The writers are IT auditors and systems control specialists, many holding the CISA, who test controls and run data analysis on real audits.

They write findings that management must act on, which is why each project answer names a control precisely enough to be put in place.

Before release, another auditor reads each project, post and ACL file. Your files pass to the writer through the coordinator, without your name.

Comments on early projects are applied to later ones, and the faith essay share is written with care for both the scripture and the course topic it addresses.

Some have worked in internal audit departments that use continuous auditing, a topic Hall returns to in the later chapters.

A single writer covers your term.

Project answers lose marks when they identify the weakness and stop, without the risk, the control or the audit response.

Security answers lose marks without both a preventive and a detective control; program change answers lose marks when they miss the step where a change can bypass approval.

CAATT answers lose marks when the tool does not match the objective, such as proposing test data where parallel simulation is needed.

Forum threads lose marks with fewer than three scholarly citations, and replies with none.

ACL assignments lose marks when results are pasted without explanation, and the essay loses marks when scripture is not tied to a specific course topic.

Revenue cycle answers lose marks when a cutoff test is described without the dates it compares, such as shipping documents against invoice dates around year end.

ERP answers lose marks when segregation of duties is discussed in general rather than by naming the conflicting roles.

A project takes two to three days from the start of its week, longer for the 100-point project in week four.

Forum threads need roughly a day and a half; the pair of replies need a day after classmates have posted.

Your share of the faith essay takes two to three days, and each ACL assignment two to three days once the data files arrive.

Each item is priced by its points and work, and ordering the whole term in week one lowers each line. If you have started a project, finishing and checking your draft costs less than starting fresh.

An urgent project can sometimes be turned around in a day, at a higher line.

The ACL assignments depend on your section posting the data files, so send them as soon as they appear.