Do My Liberty BUSI 336 Course for Me

Week one: Discussion Board 1 on the field of entrepreneurship, the Entrepreneur Self Analysis and the group track designation.

Week two: Discussion Board 2 on crafting ideas and value propositions, and the group's Business Idea Definition, beside Quiz 1.

Week three: Discussion Board 3 and the Industry Feasibility Analysis, sizing the market and its competition.

Week four: Discussion Board 4 and the Product Feasibility Analysis, testing whether customers want the product, after a lesson on revenue forecasting.

Week five: the Go-to-Market Strategy, beside Quiz 2, with no discussion board.

Week six: Discussion Board 5, the Financial Feasibility Analysis and the Draft Business Presentation. Week seven: Discussion Board 6 on entrepreneurial strategies. Week eight: the Final Business Presentation with faith integration and social responsibility, beside Quiz 3.

Group items fall in six of the eight weeks.

Week five has no discussion board, which leaves room for the go-to-market strategy and the second quiz.

Readings for each week are short, which leaves time for the group work.

Discussion boards are done with a real venture in mind, often your group's, so the board and the analysis reinforce each other. A board on industry feasibility might show how a pet grooming startup would read local demand and competitor density.

The self analysis is built from your answers to a short questionnaire and kept in your voice.

Group shares follow the team's template. If you are assigned the market data, the share sizes the market from public sources; if you have the competitor section, it compares rivals on price, quality and location; if you have the financials, it estimates startup costs, monthly expenses, revenue and break-even with each assumption stated.

Go-to-market shares define the first customers, the channels to reach them, pricing and the launch sequence.

Presentation shares are built as slides with short speaking notes, consistent with the analyses already submitted.

A second reviewer checks every figure and claim.

Files reach you early so the team can review them before submission.

Where your group divides a section between two people, your share is written to meet your teammate's half cleanly.

Every share cites its sources so the group can defend any number.

Value propositions are written in one plain sentence a customer would understand.

This coursework is handled by someone who has launched a business, worked inside a young company or coached founders.

They know what a lender or investor looks for and write the analyses with that reader in mind.

They are comfortable with spreadsheets for forecasts and break-even calculations.

They can work with nonprofit ventures, where grants, donors and impact replace investors and profit.

One writer handles your boards and shares across the term.

No writer learns who you are.

Faith and social responsibility sections are written by people who handle them thoughtfully.

Their discussion examples come from real small businesses and nonprofits they have seen succeed or struggle.

They also know nonprofit funding, from small grants to recurring donors, for groups that choose a mission-driven venture.

It gets hard when the group chooses an idea too late, leaving the industry analysis rushed.

It gets hard when feasibility work becomes cheerleading, ignoring evidence that the idea may not work.

It gets hard in week six, when the financial analysis, the draft presentation and a discussion board fall together.

It gets hard when the forecast rests on guesses rather than stated assumptions.

It gets hard when slides contradict the earlier analyses, such as a price in the pitch that differs from the go-to-market plan.

It gets hard to fold faith integration and social responsibility into a business pitch without it feeling bolted on.

Early shares, stated assumptions and one consistent writer address most of these.

It also gets hard when group members use different numbers for the same thing, such as two price points in two sections.

Product tests can go wrong when they rely on friends' opinions instead of evidence from likely customers.

Deadlines inside the group can also slip when nobody owns the final assembly.

Discussion boards are delivered a few days before each week opens, so they can be read and posted early in the week.

Your share of each group analysis arrives a few days before the week closes, or sooner if the team sets its own date, leaving time for the group to combine sections and check consistency.

Your slides and notes for the draft presentation arrive early in week six, and for the final presentation early in week eight, so you have time to rehearse if you deliver live or record.

Nothing is scheduled on quiz days, which fall in weeks two, five and eight.

The figure reflects the boards and shares you pass on, how large your shares are and how much of the term is left; quizzes and recordings are always excluded.

Students who join after the venture has been chosen begin with the next group deadline, after the writer reads what the team has already submitted.

If you want changes before sharing a section with your team, the original writer makes them, usually the same day.