Do My Liberty ACCT 660 Course for Me

Week one, Monday to Friday, covers four chapters on forensic analytics and data preparation. The checklist, introductions and the first forum thread are due.

Week two covers two chapters, with the first forum's replies and the project topic submission, which carries no points but fixes the company.

Week three covers two chapters on digit tests, with the second thread and Reading Outline 1.

Week four covers two chapters, with the second forum's replies and Project Part 1, the company and fraud background.

Week five covers two chapters, including relative size and correlation, with the third thread.

Week six covers two chapters, with the third forum's replies and no other item. It is the lightest week of the term.

Week seven covers two chapters on monitoring, with the fourth thread and Project Part 2, the detection plan.

Week eight covers the last two chapters, with the fourth forum's replies and Reading Outline 2, due on the final Friday.

Every week after the first runs Saturday to Friday.

The reading is heaviest at the start, four chapters in week one, then two a week to the end. The final week covers the last two chapters as well as the second outline.

Nigrini's chapters carry the course, so keeping pace with the reading matters more than in most classes. Each outline depends on it.

Reading comes first each week, and notes from it feed both the outline and that week's forum. That keeps the work consistent.

Each thread answers its prompt at length with three scholarly references, using the chapter's tests as its backbone. Replies take up classmates' points and add two references each.

Outline entries are written as the chapters are read, one double-spaced page or more per chapter. Each test is recorded so that it can be run again later, from the data required to the result that should raise concern.

For the project, candidate companies are compared in week one for public reporting and the role of technology. You approve one before the topic submission.

Part 1 is researched and drafted in weeks three and four, centered on the system that was abused and the control that failed. It draws on at least five sources.

Part 2 is drafted in weeks five and six, matching each relevant Nigrini test to a fact from Part 1. It adds the biblical worldview the prompt asks for and is delivered early in week seven.

Each delivery includes a short note on what it covers, useful as a reference later.

Where a test needs a worked example to be clear, the outline includes a short one. That makes the notes useful long after the course.

Sources for the threads mix scholarly work on fraud analytics with Nigrini's text. Each reply adds two references of its own.

The project company is approved by you before the topic submission, and nothing is written until then.

The coursework is done by a forensic data analyst, typically a CPA or CFE who uses analytics in investigations or internal audit.

They apply Nigrini's tests to real data and know which ones catch which schemes. That knowledge shapes Part 2.

Because they follow reported technology frauds, a suitable case is found quickly.

A second analyst reviews every item before delivery. The same analyst handles the whole course.

Your identity stays with the coordinator, and the analyst sees only the prompts.

Many have written fraud reports for boards and prosecutors. Several have taught analytics to auditors.

They know which tests suit payroll files, payables ledgers or journal entries.

A second analyst reads each item before it is sent to you.

Week one is hard because four technical chapters arrive with a 750-word thread.

The outlines are hard because they must be detailed, a page or more per chapter, and they cover many chapters at once.

Week four is crowded, with replies and Project Part 1 due together. Week seven is the same, with a thread and Part 2.

Part 2 is hard when Part 1 stayed general, since the detection plan needs specific facts to test against.

Digit tests are hard to explain in plain words, especially the second-order test and what its results mean.

Week eight ends the course with an outline covering the second half of the book, which is easy to underestimate.

The topic choice in week two is easy to underrate. A case with thin public reporting leaves Part 1 short of its 2,000 words.

Replies are long for discussion posts, 250 words each with their own references, which makes the reply weeks heavier than they look.

Continuous monitoring in week seven asks for a view on whether tests should run routinely, which needs an argument rather than a summary.

Correlation and time-series tests later in the book are the most mathematical, and the forum asks what their results mean in practice.

Threads are delivered at the start of their weeks and replies once classmates have posted.

Outlines come in weeks three and eight, ahead of each deadline.

The background is ready in week four and the detection plan in week seven.

The project parts are the largest costs, followed by the forums and the outlines.

Booking the full course at the start costs less per item.

Each forum is one line, thread and replies together. Outlines cost less when ordered with the forums.

Urgent work costs more, especially the project parts. A mid-term start is quoted from the next item due.

Every item comes as an editable file.

Ordering by week two gives the project its full runway.